baloyi – slides should be stitched together to form 1 document locating the site needs a larger contextual map, minimum scale of 1:20000. would be helpful to know where the photographs are located on the plan. attractions in the area page isn’t accurate. from the project, it is difficult to ascertain why you like this area.
dugmore – very well done 2nd handin which
covers all the required + necessary scales.
captions accompanying the images on page 2 would have vastly enhanced
the project giving the reader a richer indepth to those spaces. a missed opportunity. why are the drawing lines on page 3 + 4
fuzzy? overall, a strong project.
hadebe – very difficult to access the project. font is too small to be legible. project needs to be framed in a larger
context for clearer understanding.
sections would have helped articulate hollard street. project would benefit from additional work.
kluth – a well articulated project with a rich narrative,
esp. the fact that 'it’s a parking lot'.
final entry is even stronger.
page 7 + 8 are just beautiful.
pity that the text creeps into the image on page 6 and blots out the
sunset. take note to format pages
correctly. a section showing the
relationship of the ‘sunset viewing platform’ and bath street below would have
helped tighten the project + demonstrate the level drop at that point. sections should always show cut through a
street to emphasise the building’s context.
letsile – project requires a context map + sections. kerk street is one on the most unique streets
in johannesburg and this has to be demonstrated by sections – a missed
opportunity. however the photographs are
very beautiful with enhancing captions.
these though could have been pushed further to really help un penetrate
the space. fantastic reference, use this
in your future projects.
mahlalela – strong project without any sections. why?
as much as the plan on page 2 is appreciated, plans always have to have
street names + a sense of scale.
always. photographs would have
benefitted from captions for richer access.
conclusion is well articulated + a pleasure to read. next time, for a stronger project, caption,
draw sections and then say something.
mavuso – as much as the 2 pages are very beautiful, but,
what do they mean? why do you like this
place? project needs to go further in its narrative to bring us to the place as is what defines it? what are the +'s or -'s. you have to explore the themes and articulate the places performance or the lack of it. ultimately it has to be your observations which communicate this. work harder on this.
mndawe – project pages need to be stitched together. you have to learn how to do this. the project has enormous potential but, unfortunately is let down from adequate + appropriate formatting. you also have to learn this. sections are too small, images have no captions, plans no street names and the overall project has no conclusion. it leaves on wanting.
momberg – fantastic cover page. fantastic images. fantastic sections. fantastic layout. the only thing missing is a conclusion +
references.
mtshali – a well constructed project with a superb cover
image. what is the difference between
the initial entry and the final entry?
kudos for covering all the scales namely: location, linkage, transport,
soci-economics, politics and space design.
please continue to work in this fashion.
well done.
nathoo – initial project the pages were not stitched
together. glad that in the reworked
version this was not so. a very strong
project with beautiful + poetic moments.
a project of this nature is well published and it’s a pity that you
didn’t source plans + sections to complete the project for a richer
narrative. but otherwise, a sensitive
piece. keep drawing.
ngoqwana – you were required to present with the
class. that being said, the project id
of mild interest which is marred by boxes within boxes + layout. why?
if you orientate a page to be
landscape, you cannot have text running the entire length of the page. its too much.
images could have been enhanced with captions as opposed to ‘the space’
or ‘the space.’ page 3, transformation:
graphic representation, is esoteric + unclear.
njapha – kudos for a challenging site and thought
provoking project. that being said, you
need to name streets when you draw plans and explain images with captions. layout also has to be consistent. in your conclusion, you begin your paragraph
with a small letter, why? it is
interesting that you throw in a future proposal thing in there, next time, make
this tighter + less european in precedent.
but a good beginning.
segooa – beautiful choice of space and well constructed
project. the only issues are
layout. on the opportunities within a
space page, you cannot have text running the length of a landscape page. break the text up into a minimum of 2 columns
for crisper format. fantastic photographs
in which some are unfortunately missing captions. why?
as much as the section is appreciated, it needs work for better
articulation. conclusion makes for a
pleasant read. what changed between the 2
submissions?
sibiya – the site only comes in on the 3rd
paragraph. this should have been done sooner.
succinctly state: my favourite place/space in jozi is newtown! so there can be no confusion. the cover image is very beautiful, but
unfortunately isn’t yours, and it has slight pixilation. why didn’t you photograph the sq. and make it
your own? layout is clear on the first + second page, even as far as to say its
crisp, but the narrative remains soulless.
why? why do you love this
place? the narrative doesn’t respond to
this – instead, remains at a historical level.
a rather dull one at that.
refrain from using boxes within boxes.
text doesn’t need to be in a box.
page should be numbered with a proper conclusion + reference page. the 2 format thing is perplexing. why a pdf + jpg? be consistent. always attempt to work in section.
simoes – a very strong project with way too much text. reads like a thesis. stay light + playful. your choice is about recreation, remain there. layout is beautiful + clear, making it easy to access the project. captions are appreciated, next time, flood a project of this nature with more images and less text. a conclusion would have completed the project. well done.
tayob – well articulated project which lacks a ‘personal’
touch. pity. project remains too academic, ticking all the
necessary boxes except the section box.
draw sections next time and make the project be an extension of your own
voice. talk about the shebeen etc. let us experience greenside through you. push yourself.



